<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent Healthcare Information Integration 6/20/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/06/20/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-62009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/06/20/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-62009/</link>
	<description>Physician practice and systems news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/06/20/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-62009/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/06/20/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-62009/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Bignurse. We didn&#039;t start out paying bills and transferring funds online; we started with a wonderfully convenient new tool that provided real and immediate value - the ATM. Seems to me we need the EHR version of such real, easily understood, and usable value first. Follow that with some McGuffey Readers for EHRs and a solid system of CONTINUING education for their 3 R&#039;s (reading, &#039;riting, &amp; retrieving) before we have this whole &quot;use &#039;em or lose&quot; conversation.

   It&#039;s as if we&#039;re going to punish the illiterate for their ignorance without offering them any education, or, like forcing folks to take college finals before they&#039;ve even learned the alphabet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Bignurse. We didn&#8217;t start out paying bills and transferring funds online; we started with a wonderfully convenient new tool that provided real and immediate value &#8211; the ATM. Seems to me we need the EHR version of such real, easily understood, and usable value first. Follow that with some McGuffey Readers for EHRs and a solid system of CONTINUING education for their 3 R&#8217;s (reading, &#8216;riting, &amp; retrieving) before we have this whole &#8220;use &#8216;em or lose&#8221; conversation.</p>
<p>   It&#8217;s as if we&#8217;re going to punish the illiterate for their ignorance without offering them any education, or, like forcing folks to take college finals before they&#8217;ve even learned the alphabet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bignurse</title>
		<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/06/20/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-62009/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Bignurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/06/20/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-62009/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Dr Alexander, I couldn&#039;t agree more.  ARRA is putting the cart before the horse.  What&#039;s needed is an incremental approach to EMR implementation that builds value as each step is achieved.  Otherwise you have inconsistent partial usage, features that aren&#039;t being used, and confusion and disappointment without knowing how to fix it. The first phase involves a 100% uptime, essential information entered as discrete data, and an organizational committment to sustainability components like ongoing training and updating of clinical lists and templates.  Without those benchmarks being achieved, there&#039;s no hope of getting interoperability or even consistent quality improvement down the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Alexander, I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  ARRA is putting the cart before the horse.  What&#8217;s needed is an incremental approach to EMR implementation that builds value as each step is achieved.  Otherwise you have inconsistent partial usage, features that aren&#8217;t being used, and confusion and disappointment without knowing how to fix it. The first phase involves a 100% uptime, essential information entered as discrete data, and an organizational committment to sustainability components like ongoing training and updating of clinical lists and templates.  Without those benchmarks being achieved, there&#8217;s no hope of getting interoperability or even consistent quality improvement down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

