<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News 11/18/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/11/18/news-111809/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/11/18/news-111809/</link>
	<description>Physician practice and systems news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:34:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazlo Hollyfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/11/18/news-111809/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazlo Hollyfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.histalkpractice.com/?p=1316#comment-769</guid>
		<description>&quot;About 85% of Misys EMR users who plan to replace their EMR say they’ll go with Allscripts Professional EHR, which is being offered at a relatively low migration price.&quot;

This is kind of deceiving since this is past on a whopping 7 Misys customers (6 who said they were moving to Professional).  Now assuming that roughly 2500-3000 providers on Misys EMR represent about 500-600 practices, it is very disingenuous to say that sampling a measly 7 is any kind of meaningful representation of the Misys EMR customer base.  If you turned this kind of response rate back to any marketing person (let along an academic journal), you would be immediately questioned on such a ridiculously low response rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;About 85% of Misys EMR users who plan to replace their EMR say they’ll go with Allscripts Professional EHR, which is being offered at a relatively low migration price.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is kind of deceiving since this is past on a whopping 7 Misys customers (6 who said they were moving to Professional).  Now assuming that roughly 2500-3000 providers on Misys EMR represent about 500-600 practices, it is very disingenuous to say that sampling a measly 7 is any kind of meaningful representation of the Misys EMR customer base.  If you turned this kind of response rate back to any marketing person (let along an academic journal), you would be immediately questioned on such a ridiculously low response rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowgirl in the Dust</title>
		<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2009/11/18/news-111809/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowgirl in the Dust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.histalkpractice.com/?p=1316#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m confused but &quot;free PHR&quot; is likely based on Google or MS giving away their platform to various payers, HIT vendors and others...then capturing demographic info that gets linked to advertisers who pester us to death.  Correct me if I&#039;m wrong but &quot;free&quot; just doesn&#039;t resonate.  Are we really that naive??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m confused but &#8220;free PHR&#8221; is likely based on Google or MS giving away their platform to various payers, HIT vendors and others&#8230;then capturing demographic info that gets linked to advertisers who pester us to death.  Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but &#8220;free&#8221; just doesn&#8217;t resonate.  Are we really that naive??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

