<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent Healthcare Information Integration 1/20/10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.histalkpractice.com/2010/01/19/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-12010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2010/01/19/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-12010/</link>
	<description>Physician practice and systems news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2010/01/19/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-12010/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.histalkpractice.com/2010/01/19/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-12010/#comment-978</guid>
		<description>Cowgirl, I think Evan&#039;s years (nearly a decade) helping run his brother&#039;s pediatric ophthalmology practice helped him understand that operations and workflow are, at best, difficult to manage optimally for any physician. Be it PDF/H or any other interim step toward helping clinicians move toward digital data management while maintaining daily operations (i.e., seeing the volume of patients necessary,) I&#039;m a fan. 

Being a doc is tough enough these days. Adding a complete workflow overhaul onto my less geek-oriented colleagues&#039; To Do lists seems counterintuitive. Helping them take steps in the right direction, even if not as fully byte-based as I&#039;d prefer, seems much more likely to eventually achieve the end goals of interoperability and meaningful exchange of clinical data you and I both desire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowgirl, I think Evan&#8217;s years (nearly a decade) helping run his brother&#8217;s pediatric ophthalmology practice helped him understand that operations and workflow are, at best, difficult to manage optimally for any physician. Be it PDF/H or any other interim step toward helping clinicians move toward digital data management while maintaining daily operations (i.e., seeing the volume of patients necessary,) I&#8217;m a fan. </p>
<p>Being a doc is tough enough these days. Adding a complete workflow overhaul onto my less geek-oriented colleagues&#8217; To Do lists seems counterintuitive. Helping them take steps in the right direction, even if not as fully byte-based as I&#8217;d prefer, seems much more likely to eventually achieve the end goals of interoperability and meaningful exchange of clinical data you and I both desire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowgirl in the Dust</title>
		<link>http://www.histalkpractice.com/2010/01/19/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-12010/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowgirl in the Dust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.histalkpractice.com/2010/01/19/intelligent-healthcare-information-integration-12010/#comment-975</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Gregg understands that Evan Steele is taking a contrarian position re EHRs because his product supports the ongoing use of paper as the MD&#039;s primary tool for interacting with an &quot;electronic&quot; health record.  Will that get us to interoperability and meaningful exchange of clinical data among providers and with patients?  Hard to see how those dots connect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Gregg understands that Evan Steele is taking a contrarian position re EHRs because his product supports the ongoing use of paper as the MD&#8217;s primary tool for interacting with an &#8220;electronic&#8221; health record.  Will that get us to interoperability and meaningful exchange of clinical data among providers and with patients?  Hard to see how those dots connect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

