Home » Guest Posts » Currently Reading:

From the Consultant’s Corner 2/6/13

February 6, 2013 Guest Posts 1 Comment

There’s No Time Like the Present: Shifting to a Core Vendor Before ICD-10 Implementation
By Brad Boyd

Is your organization thinking about transitioning your patient access, EHR and/or revenue applications to a single core vendor? If you are, you are not alone. This has been a strong industry trend over the past three years, and many IT vendors have made this a development priority.

With healthcare reform ushering in initiatives like Meaningful Use, accountable care organizations, and value-based reimbursement models, technology systems that smoothly integrate clinical and business data are essential. In most cases, a core vendor that provides tight integration across these applications is better positioned to meet a healthcare organization’s business intelligence requirements.

I recommend that organizations evaluate the benefits of a core vendor from feature, functionality, total cost of ownership, and reporting perspectives. Truly integrated systems provide a variety of benefits which often include decreased operating expenses, reduced lost charges, improved reporting, and a rich functionality which can enhance the overall patient experience. However, with the benefits of a core vendor often come trade-offs from a best-of-breed perspective, particularly gaps in workflow capabilities.

Given the delay in ICD-10 implementation, now is an opportune time to engage in a focused assessment on long-term vendor strategy. While a system conversion is not an insignificant undertaking, there are efficiencies and cost advantages to make this switch in tandem with other changes required by ICD-10.

While switching to one core vendor may not be appropriate for your organization — or resource availability may not permit tackling both ICD-10 and a system conversion concurrently — examining the benefits, cost impact, and operational readiness is a valuable exercise. The delay in ICD-10 provides you with an opportunity for this analysis.

Brad Boyd is vice president of sales and marketing for Culbert Healthcare Solutions.

Currently there is "1 comment" on this Article:

  1. just another var says:

    Sounds good, painless and makes sense on paper.

    But then again, if it sounds easy or too good to be true, it probably is

Comment on this Article:







Founding Sponsors


  

Subscribe to Updates


Click here to sign up for spam-free updates.

Search All HIStalk Sites


Loading


Platinum Sponsors


  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Gold Sponsors


  

  

Follow

Reader Comments

  • Bignurse: Dr Gregg, Your situation is so sad and so unacceptable. How many small vendors are being crushed altogether by larger c...
  • : Gregg, Gregg, Gregg! So sad to read of your tribulations but only because I really can feel your pain. Can't help but ...
  • Jeff Hannamen: Pediatric visit rates have dropped over the last two years for the simple reason that the last two flu seasons can't com...
  • will ross: while this does not address the numerous data entry issues you raise, this may provide a bit of an assist on the present...
  • Jeff Hannamen: Good luck getting the AMA to drop CPT - they make $40-70m a year from the copyrights and it allows their primary drivers...

Tweets

adpadvancedmdadpadvancedmd: Electronic health data gaining favor according to federal data set released today via @WSJ http://t.co/vlAlNw9Dmj #EHR
6 hours ago
billiansbillians: 7 ideas for physician content marketing http://t.co/WD0SvABHRr (via @symplur) #hcsm http://t.co/dhfdDyF8Op
7 hours ago
billiansbillians: 7 ideas for physician content marketing http://t.co/WD0SvABHRr (via @symplur) #hcsm
7 hours ago
billiansbillians: Anne Arundel Medical Center (@aamcnews) recently opened its 30-bed Acute Care of the Elderly unit. #VITALS
7 hours ago
billiansbillians: Effective July 1, Civista Medical Center will operate under the new name University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center. #VITALS
7 hours ago